Re: /proc/config idea

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Tue, 3 Apr 2001 15:32:57 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Pete Toscano: "Re: Stuck: What to do with solid locks?"
Previous message: John Jasen: "Re: Bugreport: Kernel 2.4.x crash"

> method) have these dependencies checked by insmod? It would be simply
> smashing to have it all inherently bullet proof. (i know never say never, but
> lower maintenance then or simpler for users or something)

The goal of modversions is to do this. It isnt perfect. Keith Owens was talking
about several ideas to improve it at the 2.5 kickoff conference

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Pete Toscano: "Re: Stuck: What to do with solid locks?"
Previous message: John Jasen: "Re: Bugreport: Kernel 2.4.x crash"