Re: SMP in 2.4

Mark Hahn (hahn@coffee.psychology.mcmaster.ca)
Wed, 18 Apr 2001 12:21:59 -0400 (EDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: george anzinger: "Re: schedule() seems to have changed."
Previous message: Marcus Meissner: "[PATCH] toshoboe pci enable"
In reply to: Dennis: "SMP in 2.4"
Next in thread: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: SMP in 2.4"

Dennis is like a pie in the face: messy, unexpected, but trivial.

On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Dennis wrote:

> Does 2.4 have something similar to spl levels or does it still require the
> ridiculous MS-DOSish spin-locks to protect every bit of code?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: george anzinger: "Re: schedule() seems to have changed."
Previous message: Marcus Meissner: "[PATCH] toshoboe pci enable"
In reply to: Dennis: "SMP in 2.4"
Next in thread: Richard B. Johnson: "Re: SMP in 2.4"