Re: ENOIOCTLCMD?

Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Sun, 13 May 2001 17:45:17 +0100 (BST)

> What I was arguing (conceptually) is that something like
> #define ENOIOCTLCMD ENOTTY
> or preferably but more invasively s/ENOIOCTLCMD/ENOTTY/ (mutatis mutandis)
>
> would result in no loss of function. I assert that ENOIOCTLCMD is
> redundant, pending a specific counterexample.

On the contrary. I can now no longer force an unsupported response when there
is a generic routine I dont wish to use

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/