Re: Nasty Requirements for non-GPL Linux Kernel Modules?

[Mike Galbraith]

On 13 May 2001, Kai Henningsen wrote:

> [e-mail] (Mike Galbraith)  wrote on 13.05.01 in <[e-mail]>:
>
> > On 13 May 2001, Kai Henningsen wrote:
> >
> > > [e-mail] (Alan Cox)  wrote on 09.05.01 in
> > > <[e-mail]>:
> > >
> > > > > you stand, it'll cost you around $15K and that, in my opinion, is
> > > > > fine. If it isn't worth $15K to protect your code then it is worth so
> > > > > little to you that there really is no good reason not to just GPL it
> > > > > from the start.
> > > >
> > > > Smart advice.
> > >
> > > Problem is, the people making that decision are not always the people
> > > wanting to distribute the work in question, in which case the argument
> > > doesn't work.
> >
> > if (!cost_analysis) goto darwinism;
>
> Thank you for completely missing the point.

You're welcome.

	-Mike