Re: no ioctls for serial ports? [was Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Num

Kai Henningsen (kaih@khms.westfalen.de)
20 May 2001 11:53:00 +0200


pavel@suse.cz (Pavel Machek) wrote on 19.05.01 in <20010519214321.A9550@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>:

> I think that plan9 uses something different -- they have ttyS0 and
> ttyS0ctl. This would leave us with problem "how do I get handle to
> ttyS0ctl when I only have handle to ttyS0"?

I've seen this question several times in this thread. I haven't seen the
obvious answer, though.

Have a new system call:

ctlfd = open_device_control_fd(fd);

If fd is something that doesn't have a control interface (say, it already
is a control filehandle), this returns an appropriate error code.

This has another benefit, in that you can get control descriptors for
stuff that doesn't currently have a filename (but does have ioctls), such
as network sockets.

MfG Kai
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/