Re: Background to the argument about CML2 design philosophy

Jonathan Morton (chromi@cyberspace.org)
Tue, 22 May 2001 00:00:35 +0100


>If you run into a case where you have a config which would work, but
>CML2 doesn't let you, why don't you fix the grammar instead of saying
>CML2 is wrong? Let's not confuse these two issues as well.

Strongly agree. Especially since I'm pushing for an explicit recognition
of the difference between a hard dependancy and a soft derivation. The
latter can be over-ridden safely by someone who knows what he's after. The
former will cause a miscompile.

--------------------------------------------------------------
from: Jonathan "Chromatix" Morton
mail: chromi@cyberspace.org (not for attachments)
big-mail: chromatix@penguinpowered.com
uni-mail: j.d.morton@lancaster.ac.uk

The key to knowledge is not to rely on people to teach you it.

Get VNC Server for Macintosh from http://www.chromatix.uklinux.net/vnc/

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version 3.12
GCS$/E/S dpu(!) s:- a20 C+++ UL++ P L+++ E W+ N- o? K? w--- O-- M++$ V? PS
PE- Y+ PGP++ t- 5- X- R !tv b++ DI+++ D G e+ h+ r++ y+(*)
-----END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/