Yes, you are right.
I was suggested by improper part of spinlock.h ...
Forget this patch.
 
> > @@ -643,9 +631,7 @@
> >  	        eexp_hw_tx_pio(dev,data,length);
> >  	}
> >  	dev_kfree_skb(buf);
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> >  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&lp->lock, flags);
> > -#endif
> >  	enable_irq(dev->irq);
> >  	return 0;
> 
> They are done this way to get good non SMP performance. Your changes would
> ruin that.
-- ======================================================================= Andrzej M. Krzysztofowicz ankry@mif.pg.gda.pl tel. (0-58) 347 14 61 Wydz.Fizyki Technicznej i Matematyki Stosowanej Politechniki Gdanskiej - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/