tcp_recvmsg() in 2.4.4

Eric Barton (eric@bartonsoftware.com)
Thu, 7 Jun 2001 18:59:06 +0100


If there are no packets on sk->recieve_queue, and nothing has been copied
to userland yet, it seems to me there is a redundant test of sk->done.

About line 1461 in net/ipv4/tcp.c:

/* Well, if we have backlog, try to process it now yet. */

if (copied >= target && sk->backlog.tail == NULL)
break;

if (copied) {
if (sk->err ||
sk->state == TCP_CLOSE ||
(sk->shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) ||
!timeo ||
(flags & MSG_PEEK))
break;
} else {
if (sk->done)
break;

if (sk->err) {
copied = sock_error(sk);
break;
}

if (sk->shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN)
break;

if (sk->state == TCP_CLOSE) {
if (!sk->done) {
/* This occurs when user tries to read
* from never connected socket.
*/
copied = -ENOTCONN;
break;
}
break;
}

if (!timeo) {
copied = -EAGAIN;
break;
}
}

When it get to if(sk->state == TCP_CLOSE), surely sk->done has already been
tested (and the socket is locked), so -ENOTCONN could be returned
immediately.

Actually I'd really appreciate it if someone could explain the order of
tests for sk->done, sk->err, sk->shutdown and sk->state...

--

Cheers, Eric

---------------------------------------------------- |Eric Barton Barton Software | |9 York Gardens Tel: +44 (117) 923 9831 | |Clifton Mobile: +44 (7909) 680 356 | |Bristol BS8 4LL Fax: call first | |United Kingdom E-Mail: eric@bartonsoftware.com| ----------------------------------------------------

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/