RE: question about scsi generic behavior

hiren_mehta@agilent.com
Fri, 8 Jun 2001 18:13:30 -0600


Well,

Hardcoding of block size to 512 bytes for disk devices is what currently
either the block device driver or the sd driver is doing. Because, if
I run dd to the same device using the corresponding block device (sde)
it runs fine. So, I feel that either the sg driver or the block device
driver
or sd driver needs to be fixed.
One more thing is that, sg driver can find out from READ_CAPACITY the
current
block size on the device. So, if dd specifies bs=4096 and count=1, then
accordingly, the sg driver should set the count to 8 and bs to the bs of
the device. IMHO, untimately, the total transfer length is what matters.

Regards,
-hiren
(408)970-3062
hiren_mehta@agilent.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Chambliss [mailto:chamb@almaden.ibm.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 4:49 PM
> To: hiren_mehta@agilent.com
> Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: question about scsi generic behavior
>
>
>
> I think you need to set bpt=8 .
>
> It is possible to set some drives to block sizes other than
> 512 bytes, and
> hardcoding 512 is not a good idea, especially in code that
> might last a
> while. In a few years we might have 4096-byte blocks to let
> the drives use
> more powerful error correcting codes.
>
> David Chambliss
> Research Staff Member, Computer Science /Storage Systems
> IBM Research Division
> (408) 927-2243 (TL 457-2243)
> FAX (408) 927-3497
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/