Re: XFS and Alan kernel tree

Keith Owens (kaos@ocs.com.au)
Wed, 13 Jun 2001 09:03:16 +1000


On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 08:25:52 +1000,
Daniel Stone <daniel@kabuki.sfarc.net> wrote:
>On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 11:08:16PM +0200, Daniel Podlejski wrote:
>> I merge XFS witch Alan tree (2.4.4-ac5). It's seems to be stable.
>> Patch against Alan tree is avaliable at:
>
>Hi Daniel,
>I've got a KDB patch against a relatively recent 2.4.5-ac6, but are you
>still continuing your porting effort to the -ac series?

kdb v1.8-2.4.5-ac6 works for -ac6 through -ac13. None of the changes
in that series affect kdb.

There have been some significant changes to page I/O handling in
2.4.6-pre[12] which are reflected in the XFS CVS tree. -ac13 is still
using the old page_launder() code which is not as clean. In addition
kdb for Linus's and AC's trees has diverged quite a bit because of the
console and NMI cleanup in -ac. Fitting XFS from CVS into -ac13 will
be very nasty, you might want to wait until AC syncs to Linus's kernel
or Linus takes some of the -ac changes.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/