Re: [reiserfs-list] Incompatibility between the reisrefs patches

Nikita Danilov (NikitaDanilov@Yahoo.COM)
Fri, 22 Jun 2001 18:00:00 +0400


Vasil Kolev writes:
> Can I use the new format with 2.2? I don't have enough space to do that...
> I would live with the limitations ... I just want it to work :)

I am afraid you cannot. Not now at least. Sorry.

>
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Nikita Danilov wrote:
>
> > Vasil Kolev writes:
> > > Maybe this is a know issue, but nonetheless.....
> > > I have dual coppermine/930 machine with 1.2G ram, kernel 2.4.5. I used
> > > reiserfs for my /home and /var partitions. When tried downgrading to
> > > 2.2.19, I got errors in syslog like 'can't find superblock' ... ( I don't
> > > have them, /var wasn't mounted, and i had to return the machine in
> > > production state... ). Does someone has any idea about this, how could I
> > > downgrade to 2.2.19 ?
> >
> > 2.4 kernels can work with both 3.5 reiserfs disk format (old) and 3.6
> > (new). 2.2 kernels---only with 3.5. Probably, you have created your
> > file-systems in the new format.
> >
> > You can boot 2.4 kernel, create new file-system large enough with
> > /sbin/mkreiserfs -v1 (old format), copy existing files there by tar or
> > cpio and then update /etc/fstab to mount file-system just created. Now,
> > you can work both with 2.2 and 2.4 kernels.
> >
> > Keep in mind, that 3.5 format has some limitations concerning file size
> > etc. Check faq at namesys.com for details. On the other hand, 3.5 often
> > considered more stable.
> >

Nikita.

> >
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/