Re: my patches won't compile under 2.4.7

Kirk Reiser (kirk@braille.uwo.ca)
25 Jul 2001 16:10:48 -0400


Huh? Did you actually write something below Alan? or are you just
making me feel insecure? 'grin'

Kirk

Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:

> >
> > As of 2.4.7 my patches to the kernel won't compile. It appears to be
> > something to do with devfs_fs_kernel.h being part of miscdevices.h. I
> > have sifted through the code but have not been able to determine
> > exactly why they won't work any more. Here is the error output from
> > my compile:
> >
> > gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=i586 -c -o speakup.o speakup.c
> > In file included from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/locks.h:8,
> > from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/devfs_fs_kernel.h:6,
> > from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/miscdevice.h:4,
> > from speakup.c:63:
> > /usr/src/linux/include/linux/pagemap.h:35: `currcons' undeclared here (not in a function)
> > /usr/src/linux/include/linux/pagemap.h:35: parse error before `.'
> > make[4]: *** [speakup.o] Error 1
> >
> > I'm not sure even where to start trying to describe what I've looked
> > at and what I don't understand. It appears that page_cache_alloc() is
> > now an inline function with an argument passed to it, where it used to
> > be a #define with no arguments. I see that struct misc_device now has
> > a new member devfs_handle but the other drivers I've looked at rtc.c
> > haven't changed their structure members to take this into account. It
> > seems nothing new is necessary because misc_register checks if it's
> > been set or not. The two error lines don't look to me to have anything
> > to do with any of these things either currcons isn't used in any of
> > the misc_device structure or anything I can see which might end up
> > calling page_cache_alloc(). Can anyone give me any ideas what I
> > should check to hunt down exactly what's going on here? It almost
> > looks like gcc is getting screwed up in it's parsing or something.
> >
> > Any ideas will greatefully be accepted I'm lost!
> >
> > Kirk
> >
> > --
> >
> > Kirk Reiser The Computer Braille Facility
> > e-mail: kirk@braille.uwo.ca University of Western Ontario
> > phone: (519) 661-3061
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
>
>

-- 

Kirk Reiser The Computer Braille Facility e-mail: kirk@braille.uwo.ca University of Western Ontario phone: (519) 661-3061 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/