Re: user-mode port 0.44-2.4.7

[Linus Torvalds]

On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> I will if Honza assures me that no future version of gcc will cause me to
> crash if I don't declare xtime volatile and I play with it while it can
> change under me (which seems not the case from his last email).

WHY DO YOU NOT ADD THE "VOLATILE" TO THE PLACES THAT _CARE_?

This is not a gcc issue. Even if gcc _were_ to generate bad code, the
global volatile _still_ wouldn't be the correct answer.

		Linus