Re: 2.4.7 softirq incorrectness.

Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com)
Thu, 26 Jul 2001 14:03:37 -0400

kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru wrote:
> > after netif_rx.
>
> But why not to do just local_bh_disable(); netif_rx(); local_bh_enable()?
> Is this not right?

that's fine, and was one of the suggested solutions during the earlier
discussion of Andrea's fix.

-- 
Jeff Garzik      | "Mind if I drive?" -Sam
Building 1024    | "Not if you don't mind me clawing at the dash
MandrakeSoft     |  and shrieking like a cheerleader." -Max
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/