> yes, ksoftirqd should just avoid you to eat all the cpu
I see now, you completely killed dead loops from Ingo's patch!
It is your original approach and I am happy with it.
Before falling to euforia, the last question:
Is Ingo really happy with this? He blamed about latency,
it is not better than in 2.4.5 (with cpu_idle fix) :-)
> I hope I didn't misunderstood the question in such case please correct
> me.
You really misunderstood this a bit, but solely because the question
was meaningless in context of 2.4.7. My apologies. :-)
Alexey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/