Re: [CFT] initramfs patch

Keith Owens (kaos@ocs.com.au)
Tue, 31 Jul 2001 01:33:01 +1000

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Neulinger, Nathan: "How much of a performance hit from running SMP kernel on UP PIII?"
Previous message: Chris Mason: "Re: ReiserFS / 2.4.6 / Data Corruption"
Maybe in reply to: Alexander Viro: "[CFT] initramfs patch"
Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: [CFT] initramfs patch"

On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 18:25:27 +0200,
"Alon Ziv" <alonz@nolaviz.org> wrote:
>I wonder... May the initramfs be used also for loading modules ???
>Hmm... it will require a pico-insmod that can run in the limited initramfs
>environment, but I believe that's all !

Busybox includes a stripped down insmod, along with lots of other tools.
http://www.lineo.com/products/technical_bulletins/busy_box046.html

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Neulinger, Nathan: "How much of a performance hit from running SMP kernel on UP PIII?"
Previous message: Chris Mason: "Re: ReiserFS / 2.4.6 / Data Corruption"
Maybe in reply to: Alexander Viro: "[CFT] initramfs patch"
Next in thread: Keith Owens: "Re: [CFT] initramfs patch"