Re: ReiserFS / 2.4.6 / Data Corruption

Chris Wedgwood (cw@f00f.org)
Tue, 31 Jul 2001 23:42:20 +1200


On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 02:59:46PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:

Sigh, I see I cannot persuade in this argument. It seems Linus is
right, and debugging checks don't belong in debugged code even if
they would make it easier for persons hacking on the code to debug
their latest hacks.

In six months time, or whenever people feel more confident about
resierfs stability (there are still many bigs to be found) then these
checks can be relaxed.

Right now, reiserfs is still relatively new --- and its much more
complex and ext2, so having additional sanity checks is a good idea.

--cw

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/