Re: [PATCH] (1/11) fs/super.c fixes

Linus Torvalds (torvalds@transmeta.com)
Mon, 13 Aug 2001 20:56:50 -0700 (PDT)


On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> Linus, I'm resending the second series of superblock handling
> fixes.

Please verify that the patches apply. They don't. Re-sending will not
help, as long as the patches do not actually apply in series.

With these patches, as with the previous batch, the result is:

patching file fs/super.c
patching file fs/super.c
patching file fs/super.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 669 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 834 with fuzz 1 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 886 with fuzz 2 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #4 FAILED at 950.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 986.
Hunk #6 FAILED at 1041.
Hunk #7 FAILED at 1070.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 1050 with fuzz 2 (offset -85 lines).
4 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/super.c.rej
... more failures ..

ie serious failures starting with 3/11.

Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/