Re: [PATCH] (1/11) fs/super.c fixes

Alexander Viro (viro@math.psu.edu)
Tue, 14 Aug 2001 00:11:44 -0400 (EDT)


On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:

>
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2001, Alexander Viro wrote:
> >
> > Linus, I'm resending the second series of superblock handling
> > fixes.
>
> Please verify that the patches apply. They don't. Re-sending will not
> help, as long as the patches do not actually apply in series.

> With these patches, as with the previous batch, the result is:
>
> patching file fs/super.c
> patching file fs/super.c
> patching file fs/super.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 669 (offset 3 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 834 with fuzz 1 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 886 with fuzz 2 (offset 1 line).
> Hunk #4 FAILED at 950.
> Hunk #5 FAILED at 986.
> Hunk #6 FAILED at 1041.
> Hunk #7 FAILED at 1070.
> Hunk #8 succeeded at 1050 with fuzz 2 (offset -85 lines).
> 4 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/super.c.rej
> ... more failures ..
>
> ie serious failures starting with 3/11.

Oh, hell... Looks like I'm in for downloading the tarball over 56K link ;-/
Just in case - md5 of fs/super.c (2.4.9-pre3) here is
3e98e0cc929aebcb186698eae026a0b1. If it differs from your tree...

_Ouch_.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/