Re: Aliases

[Jim Roland]

Having recently gone from 2.2 to 2.4 what's the device convention now?  I
thought it was eth0 (example) and eth0:0 .. eth0:255, but knew kernel 2.4
would take it further.

----- Original Message -----
From: "dlang" <[e-mail]>
To: <[e-mail]>
Cc: <[e-mail]>
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 9:48 PM
Subject: Re: Aliases

> I haven't run into it yet, and yesterday I setup a box with >1700
>
> David Lang
>
>
>
> On Thu, 16 Aug 2001 [e-mail] wrote:
>
> > Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 17:11:27 -0400
> > From: [e-mail]
> > To: [e-mail]
> > Subject: Aliases
> >
> > Is their a limit on the number of alias interfaces you can have under
2.4?
> > -
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel"
in
> > the body of a message to [e-mail]
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [e-mail]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>