> I'd like some comments on the following patch.
>
> This patch is designed to add finer-grained timing (similar to the i386 timing)
> to add_timer_randomness().  The only tricky bit is that the PPC601 doesn't
> support the timebase registers.  Accordingly, I've added a flag to the PPC port
> that is used to keep track of whether or not the processor supports the timebase
> register.
>
> Is there a better way to keep track of this information?  i386 has a struct with
> useful information stored, but it doesn't look like PPC does.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris
>From the patch:
--- linux-2.2.19-clean/arch/ppc/kernel/setup.c  Sun Mar 25 11:31:49 2001
+++ linux-2.2.19/arch/ppc/kernel/setup.c        Wed Aug 22 16:34:51 2001
  ...
+extern int have_timebase = 1;
  ...
--- linux-2.2.19-clean/include/asm-ppc/processor.h      Sun Mar 25 11:31:08 2001
+++ linux-2.2.19/include/asm-ppc/processor.h    Wed Aug 22 16:34:51 2001
  ...
+extern int have_timebase;
  ...
Hrmm...
Am I missing something, or should at least one of these not be extern?
-- Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ignacio@openservices.net>
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/