On Mon, Aug 27, 2001 at 11:40:44PM +0200, Rogier Wolff wrote:
> However, as the X server manages to finish doing what it has to do before
> the next timer tick, it will almost never get a timer tick accounted to i=
t.
Yes, I also realised that, and other people also seem to think it is this w=
ay.
So the conclusion is basically that the card can't chew data that fast and I
should use busmastering instead of memcpy (and other drivers should do that
too because "hidden load" occurs anyway). I'm working on it.
Thanks to all who replied, I am as always pleased by the cooperation in
open-source world and wish everyone good luck. Yeah, and linux rocks of cou=
rse
:-)
> Roger.=20
Bye,
Peter Surda (Shurdeek) <shurdeek@panorama.sth.ac.at>, ICQ 10236103, +436505=
122023
--
I believe the technical term is "Oops!"
--RNRUMt0ZF5Yaq/Aq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7isM3zogxsPZwLzcRAgXzAKCHnTTIGYjT9aR40gPOm6ccJxXi6wCfa08m
s5MbnsZx7O7rCCepVt8sehg=
=TPst
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--RNRUMt0ZF5Yaq/Aq--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/