Wednesday, August 29, 2001, 3:58:07 PM, you wrote:
>> killall5 -15; sleep 5; killall5 -9; sleep 5
>> killall5 -15; sleep 5; killall5 -9; sleep 5
>> killall5 -15; sleep 5; killall5 -9 ?
>>
>> This looks ugly and total sleep time is 25 sec.
>> A better way is to make NFS daemons understand what user wants after
>> first call, not a third.
JP> This already looks like overkill :-) Only the first one should be
JP> needed. I can understand that NFSD could disable signal 15, but not
JP> how it can disable 9... The only way I know for that to happen is
JP> if the process is in an uninterruptable sleep for some reason (and
JP> that should only delay signal delivery, not eliminate it).
It looks like killall5 bug - "killall -9 nfsd" kills nfsd at once.
Do you know where killall5 source is? There's no killall5 in
util-linux...
Best regards,
VDA
-- mailto:VDA@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua http://port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua/vda/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/