Re: [IDEA+RFC] Possible solution for min()/max() war
Daniel Phillips (phillips@bonn-fries.net)
Thu, 30 Aug 2001 19:26:19 +0200
On August 30, 2001 07:03 pm, Peter T. Breuer wrote:
> "Daniel Phillips wrote:"
> > More than anything, it shows that education is needed, not macro
patch-ups.
> > We have exactly the same issues with < and >, should we introduce
> > three-argument macros to replace them?
>
> # define le(t,a,b) ({ t _a = a; t _b = b; min(t,_a,_b) == _a ; })
> # define ge(t,a,b) ({ t _a = a; t _b = b; min(t,_a,_b) == _b ; })
Oh, you are one sick puppy.
For completeness:
# define lt(t,a,b) ({ t _a = a; t _b = b; min(t,_a,_b) != _b ; })
# define gt(t,a,b) ({ t _a = a; t _b = b; min(t,_a,_b) != _a ; })
--
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/