Jonathan
Eric Youngdale [eric@andante.org] wrote:
> I am afraid I would have to agree with Gérard. We were planning on
> cleaning this mess up in the 2.5 kernel, and my inclination would be to
> leave this alone until then.
>
> -Eric
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gérard Roudier" <groudier@free.fr>
> To: "Jonathan Lahr" <lahr@us.ibm.com>
> Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 5:32 PM
> Subject: Re: io_request_lock/queue_lock patch
>
>
> >
> > Here are my welcome comments. :)
> >
> > In my opinion, it would well be a miracle if your patch does not introduce
> > new race conditions, at least for drivers that still use the old scsi done
> > method.
> >
> > Gérard.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/