Re: Linux 2.4.9-ac5

[Jamie Lokier]

Albert D. Cahalan wrote:
> The LGPL, X11, and 2-clause BSD licenses shouldn't set the tainted flag.
> Perhaps the licenses should simply be listed.
> 
> $ cat /proc/sys/kernel/licenses
> GPL
> Public Domain
> unknown
> BSD(2)
> Microsoft-EULA-v666

Print the loaded modules, and their licenses, one per line?
"Microsoft-EULA-v666" is a bit confusing if you don't know where it came
from.

Also, I see "GPL".  With Linus' and Alan's declarations last year,
shouldn't it be:

  GPL version 2 only
  GPL version 2 (or, at your option, any later version)

;-) no that's not a serious suggestion.

-- Jamie