Re: [SOLVED + PATCH]: documented Oops running big-endian reiserfs

David S. Miller (davem@redhat.com)
Sun, 02 Sep 2001 16:08:59 -0700 (PDT)


From: Richard Zidlicky <Richard.Zidlicky@stud.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2001 00:34:37 +0200

On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 07:57:17PM +0200, thunder7@xs4all.nl wrote:
> /* 64 bit systems (and the S/390) need to be aligned explicitly -jdm */
> -#if BITS_PER_LONG == 64 || defined(__s390__)
> +#if BITS_PER_LONG == 64 || defined(__s390__) || defined(__hppa__)
> # define ADDR_UNALIGNED_BITS (3)
> #endif

couldn't reiserfs use asm/unaligned.h like anyone else?
Seems at least sparc and mips may need the same treatment.

Sparc will act correctly for unaliagned accesses.

It will trap and run very slowly, but it wont' OOPS and
it will give correct results.

This is actually required behavior, I don't know why parisc
is acting differently.

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@redhat.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/