Re: [bug report] NFS and uninterruptable wait states

David Woodhouse (dwmw2@infradead.org)
Mon, 03 Sep 2001 18:14:01 +0100


pwaechtler@loewe-komp.de said:
> Because historically the 'D' meant "wait on _D_isk" 8-)

Waiting uninterruptibly on a local device is somewhat saner than waiting
uninterruptibly on a network server. If you ignore the cases where we end up
in D state waiting for a removable medium which has been removed, of course.

These days, disk technology is sufficiently complex that the cop-out of
saying "nothing will ever go wrong, let's not bother to implement the
cleanup code" is probably no longer appropriate even there.

--
dwmw2

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/