Re: page_launder() on 2.4.9/10 issue

Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Thu, 6 Sep 2001 13:57:42 -0300 (BRST)


On Thu, 6 Sep 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote:

> Err, not quite the whole story. It is *never* right to leave the disk
> sitting idle while there are dirty, writable IO buffers.

Define "idle" ?

Is idle the time it takes between two readahead requests
to be issued, delaying the second request because you
just moved the disk arm away ?

Is idle when we haven't had a request for, say, 3 disk
seek time periods ?

Is idle when we won't be getting any request soon for the
area where the disk arm is hanging out ? (and how do we
know the future?)

regards,

Rik

-- 
IA64: a worthy successor to i860.

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy)

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/