Re: [PATCH] fix register_sysrq() in 2.4.9++

[Randy.Dunlap]

Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> u> +
> > +static inline int register_sysrq_key(int key, struct sysrq_key_op *op_p)
> > +{
> > +     return -1;
> > +}
> 
> make it report ok as other non compiled in stuff does - then you can avoid
> masses of ifdefs

Yeah, I considered that, and it doesn't matter to me whether it
reports 0 or -1, but it's the data pointer that (mostly) requires
the #ifdefs, unless the data is always present or a dummy data pointer
is used.... ?

~Randy