Re: [PATCH] Preemption Latency Measurement Tool
Dieter Nützel (Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de)
Sun, 23 Sep 2001 01:46:25 +0200
Am Sonntag, 23. September 2001 01:40 schrieb safemode:
> ok. The preemption patch helps realtime applications in linux be a little
> more close to realtime. I understand that. But your mp3 player shouldn't
> need root permission or renicing or realtime priority flags to play mp3s.
> To test how well the latency patches are working you should be running
> things all at the same priority. The main issue people are having with
> skipping mp3s is not in the decoding of the mp3 or in the retrieving of the
> file, it's in the playing in the soundcard. That's being affected by
> dbench flooding the system with irq requests. I'm inclined to believe it's
> irq requests because the _only_ time i have problems with mp3s (and i dont
> change priority levels) is when A. i do a cdparanoia -Z -B "1-" or
> dbench 32. I bet if someone did these tests on scsi hardware with the
> latency patch, they'd find much better results than us users of ide
If you would have read (all) posts about this and related threads you should
have noticed that I am and others running SCSI systems...
> even i dont get any skips when i run the player at nice -n -20.
During dbench 16/32 and higher? Are you sure?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to firstname.lastname@example.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/