Re: broken VM in 2.4.10-pre9

Rik van Riel (riel@conectiva.com.br)
Sun, 23 Sep 2001 10:27:16 -0300 (BRST)


On 23 Sep 2001, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br> writes:

> > > I would also like to have time to investigate what happens if the pages
> > > associated with a program load are handled in larger blocks, meta-pages
> > > perhaps, which would at least cause many to be loaded at once on a page
> > > fault, rather than faulting them in one at a time.
> >
> > This is an interesting thing, too. Something to look into for
> > 2.5 and if it turns out simple enough we may even want to
> > backport it to 2.4.
>
> filemap_nopage already does all of this except put the page in the
> page table.

Exactly, there are two things we need to fix:

1) set up the page tables in a clustered way
2) make filemap_nopage() aware of sequential IO and
teach it to do asynchronous readahead .. maybe even
with drop-behind on the VMA level ?

regards,

Rik

-- 
IA64: a worthy successor to i860.

http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/

Send all your spam to aardvark@nl.linux.org (spam digging piggy)

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/