Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: [PATCH] 2.4.10 improved reiserfs a lot, but could still be better

Chris Dukes (
Mon, 24 Sep 2001 17:08:29 +0100

On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 05:08:10PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Those drives should be blacklisted and rejected as soon as someone tries
> > to mount those pieces rw. Either the drive can make guarantees when a
> > write to permanent storage has COMPLETED (either by switching off the
> > cache or by a flush operation) or it belongs ripped out of the boxes and
> > stuffed down the throat of the idiot who built it.
> In which case you can choose between ancient ST-506 drives and SCSI

I thought that Andre had some information as to which devices were
compliant and which weren't.

Chris Dukes
The law is a code that isolates justice from public participation. 
 -- Stephen Marhall
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at