Re: all files are executable in vfat

William Scott Lockwood III (thatlinuxguy@hotmail.com)
Tue, 25 Sep 2001 12:31:01 -0500


I'm sorry, I should have been more specific - should we have a dmask option?
So we could give the sysadmin/user the choice...

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nerijus Baliunas" <nerijus@users.sourceforge.net>
To: "William Scott Lockwood III" <thatlinuxguy@hotmail.com>;
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; "Alexander Viro" <viro@math.psu.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 12:25 PM
Subject: Re: all files are executable in vfat

> On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 12:19:09 -0500 William Scott Lockwood III
<thatlinuxguy@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> WSLI> dmask?
> WSLI>
> WSLI> ----- Original Message -----
> WSLI> > I too used noexec to get around this problem. Is there anyway to
get umask
> WSLI> > to ignore directories? I.E. (v)fat should always leave directories
> WSLI> executable
> WSLI> > in my opinion?
>
> There is no such option in man and using it did not help.
>
>
> Regards,
> Nerijus
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/