> On Sun, Sep 23, 2001 at 10:46:36PM +0100, arjan@fenrus.demon.nl wrote:
> > In article <E15lH4e-0000VP-00@the-village.bc.nu> you wrote:
> > >> If you took my patch for it, PLEASE don't send it for inclusion; it's an
> > >> evil hack and no longer needed when Intel fixes the bug in their 440GX bios.
> >
> > > "when" is not a word I find useful about most bios bugs. Try "if" or
> > > "less likely that being hit on the head by an asteroid"
> >
> > This case is different. Intel promised the update "soon". For them it's
>
> oh, they _promised_! great!
>
> on another note...
>
> 2.4.10 is great incidentally, noticeably improved performance for
> a somewhat large postgresql db on raid0 (35GB, ~100 million rows)
>
> if anyone's interested i'll post numbers vs. 2.4.9 as i do more testing.
Please do. (the more detailed the better)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/