> > list_del (p);
> > p = p->next;
> > delete_desc (s, desc);
> Personally, I say the above piece of code is faulty. Refering to a
> pointer after you appearently deleted it, is just very bad programming
> practice.
yep. this is one reason why the 2.4.10 kernel clears the ->next and ->prev
pointers in list_del() - the above code will break immediately.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/