[ 2.4.9-ac10ish.. slow deleting of 25GB, horrible latency ]
>
>Hmmm, I'd be curious to see how 2.4.9-ac16 (or 2.4.10) performs there. The
>reiserfs delete code should be scheduling enough due to transaction
>stop/starts that interactive performance isn't that bad.
Will check both of you suggestions over the next few days, thanks!
>You should be able to repeat your results by doing the same tests on sparse
>files:
>
>dd if=/dev/zero of=foo bs=1M count=1 seek=250000
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/