Re: Adding a printk in start_secondary breaks 2.4.10, not 2.4.9 ??

Martin J. Bligh (
Fri, 28 Sep 2001 11:37:08 -0700

> I suspect the panic has nothing to do with adding the printk, but merely
> that the timing patterns of your disgusting hack have changed
> Happy logical analysers 8)

But this printk breaks a standard SMP machine without my patches (well,
just this tiny printk part), not just the NUMA boxes ....


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at