Re: %u-order allocation failed

Mikulas Patocka (mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz)
Tue, 9 Oct 2001 01:54:49 +0200 (CEST)


On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Linus Torvalds wrote:

>
> On Tue, 9 Oct 2001, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> >
> > Linus, what do you think: is it OK if fork randomly fails with very small
> > probability or not?
>
> I've never seen it, I've never heard it reported, and I _know_ that
> vmalloc() causes slowdowns.
>
> In short, I'm not switching to a vmalloc() fork.

The patch uses buddy by default and does vmalloc only if buddy fails.
Slowdown is not an issue here.

Mikulas

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/