Re: Linux 2.4.10-ac11

[Miles Lane]

On Wed, 2001-10-10 at 20:30, Tom Rini wrote:
> Hello.  In updating the PPC defconfigs, I noticed that
> drivers/usb/Config.in will ask questions on machines where CONFIG_PCI=n
> but CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL=y.  The following puts all of the USB items
> under the if [ "$CONFIG_USB" = "y" -o "$CONFIG_USB" = "m" ] check and
> fixes some spacing bits.

Do we really still think USB deserves the Experimental label?
I use it all the time and it seems about as solid as any of
the other subsystems.  I know drivers continue to evolve, get
bugs fixed and new ones get added, but is that a good reason
to mark all USB support experimental?

Just wondering what the criteria are,

	Miles