On Sun, Oct 14, 2001 at 10:52:54AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
=20
> > When I was using ext2 I always mounted the /usr partition read-only, so
> > that a fsck weren't necessary at boot - and the files were all
> > guaranteed to be OK to bring the system up at least.
> >=20
> > Does this (mount -o ro) make sense with ReiserFS as well? What I mean
> > is, is there a chance of a file getting corrupted that was only *read*
> > (not *written*) at or before a power outage?
>=20
> Yes, after the mount is finished, reiserfs won't change the files on a
> readonly mount.
What I meant is this: AFAIK, if you exclude broken hardware, in ext2 there
is no chance of a file that was never written to since mounting being
corrupted on a crash, even if the fs was mounted read-write.
Is this the same thing with ReiserFS?
--=20
Jens Benecke =B7=B7=B7=B7=B7=B7=B7=B7 http://www.hitchhikers.de/ - Europas =
Mitfahrzentrale
Crypto regulations will only hinder criminals who obey the law.
--df+09Je9rNq3P+GE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Weitere Infos: siehe http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7ydcb153rQBa8U44RAtf2AJ9EElOmjyAUNdiHtU3kfl70UlzyygCfb1Tc
/hed2+/K5qnLuU0dwQkqW0o=
=at4F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--df+09Je9rNq3P+GE--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/