> The following diff was made in 2.4.4.  diff -u --recursive
     > --new-file v2.4.4/linux/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c linux/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c
     > --- v2.4.4/linux/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c Fri Feb 9 11:29:44 2001
     > +++ linux/fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c Sat May 19 17:47:55 2001
     > @@ -244,6 +245,11 @@
     >          */
     >         pdentry = child->d_inode->i_op->lookup(child->d_inode,
     >         tdentry); d_drop(tdentry); /* we never want ".." hashed
     >         */
     > + if (!pdentry && tdentry->d_inode == NULL) {
     > + /* File system cannot find ".." ... sad but possible */
     > + dput(tdentry);
     > + pdentry = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
     > + }
     > Umh. How is it possible to have a valid dentry which has no
     > parent?  Even "/.." is linked to "/."
Who said these are *valid* dentries?
There's no way you can fit full path information into an NFS
filehandle, so when the client passes such an object to nfsd, the
latter sometimes has to make so-called 'disconnected' dentries. These
are dentries which contain no path information, and are basically just
providing a dentry alias for the inode.
The code you are looking at attempts to call the filesystem in order
to lookup a file named '..' from just such a disconnected dentry. The
purpose being to actually recreate the path, and hence convert the
dentry into a valid one...
Cheers,
  Trond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/