Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH][RFC] Proposal For A More Scalable Scheduler

Davide Libenzi (davidel@xmailserver.org)
Tue, 30 Oct 2001 20:45:02 -0800 (PST)


On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Mike Kravetz wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 05:06:16PM -0800, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Chat - VolanoMark simulator. Result is a measure of throughput.
> > > Higher is better.
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > How does this test work exactly ?
> > Did You measure the run queue length while this was running ?
> > I'm going to modify LatSched to output other info like rqlen and
> > tsk->counter at switch time.
> > I'd like to have a schedcnt dump while this test is running.
> > Anyway this test shows that what i'm doing now ( working on the balancing
> > schemes ) is not wasted time :)
>
> Take a look at our OLS presentation slides starting at:
>
> http://lse.sourceforge.net/scheduling/ols2001/img50.htm
>
> This is basically a message passing (via sockets) benchmark with
> high thread counts/runqueue lengths.

Are threads pre-created at startup or are dynamic ?

- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/