Re: [Lse-tech] Re: [PATCH][RFC] Proposal For A More Scalable Scheduler

Davide Libenzi (davidel@xmailserver.org)
Sat, 3 Nov 2001 14:10:20 -0800 (PST)


On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, Hubertus Franke wrote:

> One more. Throughout our MQ evaluation, it was also true that
> the overall performance particularly for large thread counts was
> very sensitive to the goodness function, that why a na_goodness_local
> was introduced.

Yes it is, but the real question is - It is better a save a few clock
cycles in goodness() or achieve a better process scheduling decisions ?

- Davide

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/