Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]

Jakob Østergaard (jakob@unthought.net)
Sun, 4 Nov 2001 21:11:18 +0100


On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 03:06:27PM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 4 Nov 2001, [iso-8859-1] Jakob %stergaard wrote:
>
> > So just ignore square brackets that have "=" " " and ">" between them ?
> >
> > What happens when someone decides "[----> ]" looks cooler ?
>
> First of all, whoever had chosen that output did a fairly idiotic thing.
> But as for your question - you _do_ know what regular expressions are,
> don't you? And you do know how to do this particular regex without
> any use of library functions, right?

A regex won't tell me if 345987 is a signed or unsigned 32-bit or 64-bit
integer, or if it's a double.

Sure, implement arbitrary precision arithmetic in every single app out there
using /proc....

-- 
................................................................
:   jakob@unthought.net   : And I see the elder races,         :
:.........................: putrid forms of man                :
:   Jakob Østergaard      : See him rise and claim the earth,  :
:        OZ9ABN           : his downfall is at hand.           :
:.........................:............{Konkhra}...............:
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/