Re: linux-2.2.20a and gcc 3.0 ?

Heinz Diehl (hd@cavy.de)
Sun, 4 Nov 2001 23:11:58 +0100

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Luigi Genoni: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
In reply to: f5ibh: "linux-2.2.20a and gcc 3.0 ?"
Next in thread: Stefan Smietanowski: "Re: linux-2.2.20a and gcc 3.0 ?"

On Sun Nov 04 2001, f5ibh wrote:

> Is 2.2.20 supposed to works when compiled with gcc-3.0.2 ?

No, use gcc 2.95.x

> It boots, but I have some missing symbols while loading some modules.
> The same config works fine with gcc-2.95.4

gcc-2.95.4 does not exist! The latest stable release is 2.95.3.

-- 
# Heinz Diehl, 68259 Mannheim, Germany
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Luigi Genoni: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
Previous message: Daniel Phillips: "Re: PROPOSAL: dot-proc interface [was: /proc stuff]"
In reply to: f5ibh: "linux-2.2.20a and gcc 3.0 ?"
Next in thread: Stefan Smietanowski: "Re: linux-2.2.20a and gcc 3.0 ?"