>>I know how it's done, it's just that in my eyes a stable release is the
>>one where you know there's only 1 .... A 2.95.4 package built on
>>different days (from CVS) will differ. A 2.95.4 package built on
>>different ways from a .tar.gz marked as 'release' will not differ.
>>
>>For instance chasing a kernel bug is difficult when 1 person might use 1
>>version of a compiler and another uses a different version when both
>>says 2.95.4, no matter how miniscule the difference.
>>
>
> Since patches are being applied to the 2.95 branch at a rate of about
> one a month, I think the date stamp in the version number should be
> quite sufficient to avoid any problems along these lines.
If it's tested and rock stable, why isn't it released?
// Stefan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/