Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/*, net/core/neighbour.c jiffies cleanup

Krishna Kumar (kumarkr@us.ibm.com)
Wed, 7 Nov 2001 19:07:47 -0800


> Unsigned arithmetic is fine. The _correct_ way to test whether something
> is in within
>
> [ start , start+HZ ]
>
> is to do
>
> if (jiffies - start <= HZ)
>
> try it. The C language guarantees that unsigned arithmetic works in a
> "modulo power of two" fashion, which means that it _is_ ok to do
> arithmetic on unsigned longs, and jiffy wrapping does not matter. No need
> to cast to "signed" or anything else.
>
> In short: It is wrong to do
>
> if (jiffies <= start+HZ)
>
> and it is _right_ to do
>
> if (jiffies - start <= HZ)

Actually this last part is wrong, isn't it ? jiffies <= start + HZ is also
a correct way to do it, since start+HZ will overflow to the current value
of
jiffies when HZ time elapses. So the above two statements are IDENTICAL. I
agree with the rest of the statements, and especially that you don't need
to worry about wrapping using unsigned numbers.

Regards,

- KK

> (as long as "start" is "unsigned long" like jiffies).
>
> Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/