Re: [RFC][PATCH] VFS interface for extended attributes

[Alexander Viro]

[Cc'd to Linus since API changes on that level definitely require his
approval]

On Mon, 12 Nov 2001, Nathan Scott wrote:

> +static long
> +extattr_inode(struct inode *i, int cmd, char *name, void *value, size_t size)

Broken.
	a) passing inode is an obvious mistake.  dentry or vfsmount/dentry.

	b) for crying out loud, what's that with SGI and ioctl-like abortions?

Rule of the tumb: if your function got a "cmd" argument - it's broken.
ioctl(2).  fcntl(2).  prctl(2).  quotactl(2).  sysfs(2).  Missed'em'V IPC
syscalls.  Enough, already.

	Folks, it's not a rocket science.  Let a function do _one_ thing,
don't turn it into a multiplexed monstrosity.  Yes, you've used only 3
syscalls.  But actually you've managed to hide ~20 of them in that code
and the fact that you've spent only 3 syscall table entries doesn't make
the things better.

	Please, come up with a decent API.