Re: [PATCH][RFC] Re: 2.4.15-pre5: /proc/cpuinfo broken

[Linus Torvalds]

On Sat, 17 Nov 2001, Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> Frankly, I'd prefer to try (b) before reverting to (a).  Patch doing that
> variant follows.  Linus, your opinion?

(d) make seq_file have my originally suggested "subposition" code.

Ie make the X low bits of "pos" be the position in the record, with the
high bits of "pos" being the current "record index" kind of thing.

That makes lseek() happy.

		Linus